Aligning with the Simpler Recycling Scheme

,

The UK government’s recent unveiling of the Simpler Recycling Scheme heralds a new era in recycling, offering a streamlined approach that resonates with the growing eco-conscious consumer base. This initiative is more than a regulatory alignment; it’s an invitation for brands to bolster their environmental stewardship, a value highly esteemed in today’s market.

At the heart of this scheme is the standardisation of recyclable materials across England, aimed at simplifying the recycling process for both consumers and businesses alike​1​​2​. This is where Skymark’s products like SKYMONO, SKYMAX and SKYMAX R materials seamlessly align, offering packaging solutions that conform to the new recycling standards.

Operational efficiency is another hallmark of the Simpler Recycling Scheme. The proposed categorisation into three waste containers for dry recycling, food waste, and non-recyclable waste sets a clear path for brands to follow​2​. Our products, SKYMONO and PUREFLEX & PAPRFLEX from Interflex Group, are tailored to fit these categories, facilitating a smooth transition to the new waste management regime.

The Simpler Recycling Scheme is not merely a regulatory requisite but a compass directing brands towards a sustainable, competitive frontier. By aligning with this initiative through adaptable, innovative, and efficient packaging solutions like those offered by Skymark, brands are not only navigating the regulatory landscape but are also steering towards a future where environmental responsibility is synonymous with market success.

Environment Secretary Therese Coffey said:

Simpler recycling will help us all recycle more easily, doing our bit to help save the planet and make the best use of precious resources that we use every day.

Alongside weekly food waste collections, we are ending the postcode lottery of what you can put in your bin so that wherever you live in the country, you will be able to recycle the same products with confidence.

Margaret Bates, Managing Director at On-Pack Recycling Label Ltd (OPRL), said:

This announcement is a prompt and clear message that will make planning and operations more efficient for local authorities, packaging producers, brands and waste managers.

In navigating the new directives from the UK government’s Simpler Recycling Scheme, a Head of Packaging finds themselves at the forefront of aligning brand strategies with these evolved recycling standards. Here’s a curated FAQ scenario offering insights into how the scheme impacts plastic packaging for food and household items, elucidating the potential pathways to enhance a brand’s sustainability image, while exploring the collaborative opportunities that the scheme avails.

Through an engaging dialogue with an expert on the scheme, the Head of Packaging delves into practical and innovative solutions, unveiling how Skymark’s products can serve as a pivot in this transition.

Head of Packaging (HoP): How does the Simpler Recycling Scheme impact plastic packaging specifically for food and household items?

Expert: The scheme specifies that “all local authorities in England must collect the same recyclable waste streams for recycling or composting from households,” encompassing plastic among other materials. This emphasizes a standardized approach to recycling, encouraging brands to adopt packaging designs that align with these defined categories to facilitate easier recycling​1​.

HoP: What Skymark products would align well with these requirements?

Expert: Given the scheme’s emphasis on collecting plastic waste, Skymark’s SKYMAX and SKYMAX R materials, designed with recyclability in mind, align well with these requirements. Additionally, SKYMONO & PUREFLEX offer recyclable PE or PP-based structures, providing sustainable packaging solutions for varied applications including household packaging​1​.

HoP: How can we leverage the scheme to enhance our brand’s sustainability image?

Expert: The scheme’s objective to “maximise use, minimise waste and drive up recycling rates” resonates with the modern consumer’s eco-conscious mindset. By aligning with this initiative through sustainable packaging solutions, you’re making a statement about your brand’s commitment to environmental responsibility, thus enhancing your brand’s sustainability image​1​.

HoP: Are there any collaborative opportunities that the scheme encourages, especially around plastic recycling?

Expert: The scheme’s emphasis on standardised recycling opens up collaborative opportunities with local authorities or recycling facilities to ensure efficient plastic waste management. Furthermore, it encourages interactions with packaging experts to explore innovative solutions that enhance the recyclability of plastic packaging for food and household items, aligning with the scheme’s goal to drive up recycling rates​1​.

 

/by

Navigating the EPR Delay

,

Insights from Packaging Manufacturers and Brands

In a time of rapidly evolving economic and regulatory landscapes, the recent announcement of the one-year delay to the implementation of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme by the UK Government, until 2025, has stirred mixed reactions. From the perspective of both packaging manufacturers and brands, it’s worthwhile to delve deeper into the implications of this development.

The SWOT Perspective

The delay in the EPR scheme presents a unique set of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) for both packaging manufacturers and brands.

On the one hand, the additional time could be a strength, granting manufacturers the opportunity to innovate and streamline their operations while brands can explore robust strategies to ensure alignment with EPR principles. However, this delay also unveils a potential weakness as it extends the period of uncertainty, challenging strategic planning for both parties.

As for opportunities, the delay allows manufacturers and brands to collaborate with stakeholders, refining strategies for EPR compliance. Conversely, the threat lies in the possibility of criticism, which could potentially harm the perception of commitment to environmental sustainability.

Weighing the Pros and Cons

For both packaging manufacturers and brands, the deferral of the EPR scheme bears varied implications.

On the positive side, the delay offers more time to strategise and prepare for the changes, which could potentially result in a smoother transition to the EPR model. The downside is the prolonged period of uncertainty that could disrupt long-term planning. Moreover, this delay could place the commitment to sustainability of both manufacturers and brands under scrutiny, affecting their public image and customer relationships.

The Larger Picture

Beyond the direct implications for manufacturers and brands, this decision also influences the broader landscape of the UK’s environmental commitments. The delay could potentially slow the progress towards national goals of eliminating avoidable waste by 2050 and achieving net-zero emissions, but the extra time might also enhance the EPR scheme’s effectiveness upon implementation.

The EPR delay offers us an opportunity to further enhance our sustainable practices and refine our packaging solutions. This isn’t a pause in progress, but a chance to improve and innovate, ensuring we deliver top value to our clients and contribute positively to the environment

Dan Richards – Sales & Marketing Director

Spotlight on Success Stories

Manufacturers and brands can use this time to learn from industry pioneers who have innovated in packaging and waste management. These successful case studies offer a roadmap on how to navigate the upcoming EPR compliance while also developing sustainable and profitable strategies.

The Balance Sheet of Sustainability

While the delay offers temporary financial respite, both manufacturers and brands need to consider the long-term economic implications of environmental commitments. With consumers becoming increasingly eco-conscious, sustainable practices, including packaging, are becoming a key market differentiator. Early investments in sustainability could reap significant future rewards.

To sum it up, the delay in the EPR scheme implementation has given both manufacturers and brands valuable time to prepare for the changes ahead, but it’s not without challenges. This interim period needs to be navigated carefully, balancing regulatory compliance with public perception, strategic decision-making, and the push for innovation. The clear goal for all parties involved is to use this additional time to not only prepare for EPR but also to reinforce commitments to sustainable practices, for the benefit of the industry, consumers, and our planet.

/by

Paper vs. Plastic: An Unbiased Examination

In the modern world, paper and plastic are two materials we encounter daily. From packaging to printed materials, these substances have become integral parts of our lives. However, as environmental concerns rise, it’s essential to understand the impacts of these materials and their roles in our society. This article aims to provide an unbiased analysis of paper and plastic, examining their recycling processes, environmental impacts, and cost factors, and introducing our innovative solutions in these areas.

The Recycling Process: A Tale of Two Materials and Our Contributions

Recycling is a crucial aspect of managing the lifecycle of both paper and plastic. However, their recycling processes differ significantly due to their unique properties. At our company, we’ve developed products that align with these recycling processes, ensuring that we contribute positively to the environment.

Our paper-based packaging solution, SKYPAPR, is fully recyclable and certified FSC. It’s an attractive option for a range of paper products, including dry & ambient and tissue overwrap. SKYPAPR supports the growing demand for paper solutions while maintaining product safety and visibility on the shelf. Our range includes uncoated, 1 side coated, and 2 side coated white and brown craft, all of which are food approved and offer excellent printability.

On the other hand, our plastic solutions, SKYMONO E and P, are fully recyclable and suitable for a variety of flow wrap applications. SKYMONO E, made from PE, is an excellent choice for high-barrier applications. SKYMONO P, made from PP, offers a reduced packaging weight, helping to reduce shipping costs, CO2 emissions, and packaging tax. Both materials have low seal initiation temperatures for easy sealing using various equipment.

Paper vs. Plastic: An Environmental and Practical Perspective

Both paper and plastic have environmental impacts throughout their lifecycle. Paper production can lead to deforestation and loss of biodiversity, but it’s biodegradable and can be recycled more times than plastic. Plastic, derived from non-renewable fossil fuels, can take hundreds of years to decompose. However, its lightweight and durable nature can reduce transportation emissions.

In terms of durability and usability, plastic’s resistance to moisture makes it suitable for a wide range of applications. Paper, while less durable, can be a better choice for packaging dry goods. The best choice between the two depends on the specific application and the waste management infrastructure available.

Cost Analysis: The Price of Convenience

Plastic is often cheaper than paper due to several factors. The raw materials for plastic (fossil fuels) are cheaper and more readily available than those for paper (trees). The production process for plastic is also less energy-intensive than for paper. Additionally, plastic’s lighter weight reduces transportation costs.

Conclusion: A Balanced View for a Sustainable Future

Neither paper nor plastic is inherently superior; each has its place depending on the application and environmental considerations. As we move towards a more sustainable future, it’s crucial to understand these materials’ impacts and make informed decisions. By improving recycling processes and waste management infrastructure, we can mitigate these materials’ environmental impacts and create a more sustainable world.

Our commitment to this sustainable future is evident in our product range. From our SKYPAPR and SKYMONO lines to our SKYMAX range of films and SKYLENE PP films, we are dedicated to providing high-quality, recyclable solutions that meet our customers’ needs while minimizing environmental impact. Each stage in the manufacture of our products is monitored, controlled, assessed, and recorded to ensure the same consistent high quality.

/by

Case Study: SKYMONO P with laser score

Introduction

In the world of product packaging, meeting customer requirements while adhering to sustainability standards can be a complex challenge. At Skymark, we believe in turning these challenges into opportunities for innovation. This case study explores how we used our unique approach to problem-solving to meet a customer’s specific needs while also addressing sustainability concerns.

Background

Our journey began in 2021 when our customer approached us with a request for a premium matt finish for their product packaging. To meet this requirement, we initially offered a Matt OPP/PE laminate, using 50um SKYMAX 6546M-C. This solution also allowed for venting through a gap in the end seal, facilitating packing and transit utilising our laser score capabilities.

Challenge

There was a growing need to transition to a more sustainable, recyclable packaging solution. This was not only to meet consumer expectations for sustainability but also to mitigate the impact of the Plastic Packaging Tax and to also future proof their product regarding the upcoming EPR legislation.

Solution

In response to these challenges, Skymark’s innovative R&D team developed a laser score vent in the back of the pack. This allowed a full end seal to be applied, resolving the pack failure issue the customer had been experiencing .

But we didn’t stop there. Recognising the need for a more sustainable solution, our team developed a shift from the laminate to SKYMONO P, a recyclable material that consumers can return at store. The proposed structure is 20um Matt OPP / 30um SKYLENE 1711.

Outcome

The introduction of the laser score vent significantly improved pack integrity, eliminating the previous issues with pack failures. Meanwhile, the transition to SKYMONO P not only offers a recyclable solution, meeting consumer demand for sustainability, but also results in a 28% pack weight reduction. This helps the customer mitigate the UK Plastic Packaging Tax, demonstrating Skymark’s commitment to providing innovative, customer-centric, and sustainable packaging solutions.

Conclusion

This case study showcases Skymark’s dedication to innovative problem-solving and sustainable practices. By listening to our customers and understanding their unique challenges, we’re able to develop bespoke solutions that not only meet but exceed their expectations. At Skymark, we believe in the power of partnership and innovation to drive growth and create value.

Please contact us to help with your packaging needs

/by

Unleashing Innovation Through Partnership

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, the ability to innovate and adapt is not just an advantage—it’s a necessity. At Skymark, we understand this imperative and have developed a unique approach to problem-solving that puts collaboration at the forefront: Partnership Development Projects (PDP).

Skymark’s Unique Approach to Problem Solving

The Power of Partnership

The PDP initiative is built on the belief that the best solutions are born from collaboration. We don’t just work for our clients—we work with them. This partnership approach allows us to fully understand our clients’ unique needs and challenges, enabling us to provide solutions that are tailored to their specific circumstances.

Our development process can start with a product, a requirement, or a design concept. This flexibility allows us to cater to a wide range of needs and ideas, ensuring that each project is uniquely tailored to the client’s situation. Whether you’re looking to improve an existing product or create something entirely new, our PDP initiative offers the flexibility and adaptability to meet your needs.

A Diverse Team for Diverse Solutions

Our PDP team is a diverse group of intuitive individuals, dedicated material specialists, graphic designers, and packaging engineers. This diversity fosters a rich pool of ideas and solutions, ensuring that each project is handled with expertise and creativity.

Each member of our team brings their unique skills and perspectives to the table, contributing to a collaborative environment where ideas can flourish. This collaborative spirit is at the heart of our PDP initiative, driving us to create innovative solutions that push the boundaries of what’s possible.

Superior Packaging Performance

But our collaborative approach doesn’t just ensure packaging performance—it guarantees superior packaging performance. By working closely with our clients, we’re able to understand their unique needs and craft bespoke innovative packaging solutions that encapsulate their brand’s essence and add value to their business.

We don’t just deliver packaging; we deliver solutions that exceed specifications and expectations. Our commitment to excellence ensures that our packaging solutions not only meet but surpass industry standards, providing our clients with a competitive edge in their respective markets.

Working With You, Not Just For You

What sets Skymark apart is our commitment to working with our clients, not just for them. Our PDP initiative is a testament to the transformative power of partnership and innovation. We believe that by working together, we can unlock new possibilities, create innovative solutions, and drive growth for both our clients and ourselves.

PDP in Action: A Case Study
To truly understand the power of our PDP initiative, let’s look at a recent case study:

Read the Case Study

This case study is a testament to the power of our PDP initiative. By working closely with our clients, we’re able to understand their unique challenges and develop innovative solutions that not only meet but exceed their expectations.

In a world where innovation is key to staying competitive, Skymark’s Partnership Development Projects offer a unique approach to problem-solving. By putting collaboration at the heart of what we do, we’re able to deliver bespoke solutions that not only meet but exceed our clients’ expectations.

Experience the power of partnership and innovation with Skymark. Together, we can solve problems, create value, and drive growth. Let’s innovate together.

To start your PDP partnership please contact us

/by

The Mass Balance Approach to Plastic Packaging Tax

,

A New Horizon for Sustainable Packaging

In the current environmental and economic landscape, the issue of plastic waste has taken centre stage. Governments, businesses, and consumers alike are grappling with the challenge of reducing plastic waste and promoting sustainable practices. One such initiative is the Plastic Packaging Tax (PPT), introduced by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). Recently, HMRC has proposed a significant change to this tax – the use of a mass balance approach to account for chemically recycled content in plastic packaging.

The mass balance approach is a method of accounting where the input and output of a process are balanced, and the properties of the input are allocated to the output products. In the context of PPT, this approach would allow businesses to account for the chemically recycled content in their plastic packaging, potentially reducing their tax liability.

The HMRC consultation document outlines the potential implications of this approach. The primary aim is to incentivize the use of chemically recycled plastics, thereby reducing the environmental impact of plastic waste. This could stimulate growth and investment in the emerging sector of chemical recycling, leading to economic development and job creation. However, the proposal is not without its challenges. Implementing a mass balance approach could introduce additional administrative burdens for businesses, requiring them to become certified and provide evidence of the recycled content in their products.

The mass balance approach presents both opportunities and challenges. On the positive side, it could drive the demand for chemically recycled plastic, promote investment in the recycling sector, and enable businesses to reduce their PPT liability. However, it could also introduce additional administrative burdens, create verification challenges, and potentially open the door to misleading environmental claims.

In analyzing these points, it becomes clear that the success of the mass balance approach will largely depend on its implementation. The potential benefits are significant, but they must be balanced against the potential drawbacks. Clear guidelines, robust verification processes, and effective enforcement will be crucial to ensure the integrity of the system and prevent misuse.

Looking ahead, the mass balance approach could represent a significant step forward in the quest for sustainable packaging. However, it is just one piece of the puzzle. Achieving a circular economy for plastics will require a multi-faceted approach, involving not only innovative taxation measures but also advancements in recycling technology, changes in consumer behavior, and global cooperation.

As we reflect on the potential of the mass balance approach, it is clear that this is a complex and evolving issue. The HMRC consultation is an important part of the process, providing an opportunity for stakeholders to contribute their views and help shape the future of the PPT. As the consultation progresses, it will be fascinating to see how this proposal develops and what impact it could have on the future of plastic packaging.

gov.uk
/by

Extended Producer Responsibility in the UK: What Lies Ahead in 2024

,

The UK government’s Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) plans are set to reshape the landscape of waste management and recycling in the country. Despite opposition from some industry groups, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) is pressing forward with the EPR scheme, which is still on track to be implemented in 2024.

What is EPR?

EPR is a system designed to make firms that supply household packaging more responsible for the costs of dealing with packaging waste. This shifts the financial burden away from councils and taxpayers, encouraging businesses to increase their use of recyclable materials. The EPR system aims to protect the environment from waste, promote resource efficiency, and move towards a more circular economy.

Data Collection and Reporting

Data collection and reporting are key components of the EPR system. Obligated businesses, including many in the packaging industry, must collect data for the revamped packaging producer responsibility system, and pay for the cost of waste collections.

According to the latest information available to Skymark, data will be reported during 2023 using the new data capture format covering household and non-household data. The data will then be used to calculate the estimate using a cost estimator tool for the payments, which will be billed in April 2024 and due to be paid in Q3 2024.

Defra has confirmed that obligated packaging producers in England, Northern Ireland, and Scotland must collect information on the amount and type of packaging they have supplied during 2023. Wales will follow shortly. Producers with a turnover of greater than £2 million and who handle more than 50 tonnes of packaging each year must also report this information to the Environment Agency twice a year. The first reports must be submitted from 1 October 2023.

Preparing for EPR

At this stage, businesses should assess their current data submission format, review all items of eligible waste, assign the relevant type, origin, and material categories, and change their template based on this. This is important as some organisations may be required to not only submit data to DEFRA, but also downstream to their supply chain depending on their position in the chain. By adjusting the reporting format, it will be easier to split those sections out.

Opposition and Cost Concerns

Despite the government’s commitment, the EPR system has met with opposition from industry groups such as the British Retail Consortium (BRCGS), who argue that the EPR and the deposit return scheme (DRS) combined will add around £4 billion in costs to retailers, which will be passed down the line. The Food and Drink Federation, whose members include large producers like Coca-Cola and Unilever, called on ministers to pause the plans, which they claim would add £60 to shopping bills.

However, Defra has listened to feedback from industry and reduced its business waste proposals from £2.7 billion to £1.4 billion. The total net cost of the new EPR system is expected to be around £1.7 billion, a figure significantly lower than early estimations of £2.8 billion.

Looking Ahead

As the 2024 EPR deadline approaches, businesses and industry groups are expected to continue lobbying for changes and clarifications. However, the UK government remains steadfast in its commitment to implementing EPR as part of its wider strategy to protect the environment and promote a more circular economy.

Deep Sagar, Chair of the Advisory Committee on Packaging, has pointed out that packaging materials that are not recycled back into new packaging harm the natural environment. EPR is expected to reduce such waste and encourage goods producers to pay for the collection of all packaging waste, thereby stimulating them to reduce or recycle more packaging. Sagar anticipates that EPR could be a game-changer, reducing the impact packaging has on the environment by regulating material use and increasing recycling.

The EPR system is a part of wider waste reforms introduced by the UK government, which also includes bans on more single-use plastic items, a deposit return scheme for drinks containers, and consistent recycling collections for households and businesses, on top of targets for recycling packaging waste.

The government’s EPR plans are in line with its 2018 Resources and Waste Strategy, which outlines how it intends to preserve material resources by minimizing waste and promoting resource efficiency. The revenue generated from the EPR scheme will support better local council services and ensure that households can recycle the same packaging materials.

In conclusion, the implementation of EPR in the UK is a significant step towards achieving a more sustainable and circular economy. Despite concerns and opposition from certain industry groups, the government stands firm in its belief that the EPR will help preserve material resources, minimize waste, and promote resource efficiency. While the transition may bring challenges, it also presents opportunities for innovation and improved environmental stewardship. As the 2024 implementation date approaches, businesses are advised to prepare accordingly, ensuring they understand their obligations and are ready to embrace the opportunities this major policy shift offers.

/by

A Tailor-made Solution for Mince Meat Producers and Packers

,

In an era where sustainability, efficiency, and quality are paramount, Skymark is at the forefront of delivering innovative packaging solutions. We are proud of SKYMONO BVP – our standout packaging solution designed to meet the specific needs of mince meat producers and packers.

Robust and Environmentally Friendly

SKYMONO BVP is a fully recyclable packaging solution, providing an eco-friendly alternative without compromising on quality. With superior barrier properties, including Oxygen Transmission Rate (OTR <0.5) and Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR <4), it ensures optimal product freshness and shelf life.

Efficiency and Local Production

A significant advantage of SKYMONO BVP lies in its reduced packaging weight compared to traditional packaging methods. Transitioning from tray and top lidding to our flow wrap results in considerable material savings. Likewise, a switch from thermoformed base web and top lidding to our flow wrap also yields a significant reduction in packaging weight.

These reductions not only decrease the overall carbon footprint, but also lead to substantial cost savings for producers and packers, making SKYMONO BVP a win-win solution.

SKYMONO BVP is produced at our Scunthorpe site, ensuring reliable, prompt delivery without concerns over transport disruptions from Europe. Our local production facilities offer peace of mind to our customers who prioritise speed, reliability, and sustainability in their supply chain.

Choose SKYMONO BVP

As market demands evolve and sustainability becomes a key driver, Skymark remains committed to providing cutting-edge, responsible packaging solutions. Choose SKYMONO BVP for your mince meat packaging needs – a choice that demonstrates your commitment to quality, efficiency, and the environment.

To learn more about SKYMONO BVP and how it can revolutionize your packaging process, contact Skymark today.

/by

A Sustainable Choice for the Future

,

In recent years, there has been a growing awareness of the environmental impact of packaging materials. Many businesses and consumers are now actively seeking ways to reduce their carbon footprint and contribute to a more sustainable future. One effective way to achieve this is by transitioning to recyclable packaging. In this article, we will explore the steps involved in making the switch, how to recycle packaging, the cost implications, and the compelling reasons to embrace sustainable packaging solutions.

How to Transition to Sustainable Packaging

Transitioning to sustainable packaging requires a systematic approach that considers the entire packaging lifecycle. Here are the key steps to follow:

  1. Assess your current packaging: Begin by evaluating your existing packaging materials and identifying areas for improvement. This includes assessing the recyclability of the materials, their environmental impact, and the feasibility of switching to more sustainable alternatives.
  2. Research recyclable packaging options: Explore the market for recyclable packaging solutions that align with your specific product requirements. We offer a range of recyclable structures such as SKYMONO, SKYPAPR, SKYMAX and SKYLENE. These products are designed to be environmentally friendly while maintaining the necessary functionality and protection for your goods.
  3. Collaborate with suppliers: Engage with your packaging suppliers to discuss the possibility of switching to recyclable materials. They can provide valuable insights, recommend suitable alternatives, and guide you through the transition process.
  4. Educate your team: Ensure that your employees are well-informed about the importance of sustainable packaging and how to handle recyclable materials properly. Conduct training sessions to raise awareness and encourage responsible practices throughout your organisation.
  5. Communicate with customers: Transparently communicate your commitment to sustainable packaging to your customers. Highlight the positive environmental impact of the switch and encourage them to participate in recycling initiatives.

How to Recycle Packaging

Recycling packaging plays a vital role in closing the loop and minimising waste. Here are some essential steps to follow:

  1. Check local recycling guidelines: Understand the recycling guidelines specific to your region. Different areas may have different requirements and capabilities when it comes to recycling certain materials. Familiarize yourself with the recycling symbols and labels to ensure proper sorting.
  2. Separate recyclable materials: Sort your packaging materials based on their recyclability. Common recyclable materials include cardboard, paper, glass, metal, and certain types of plastic. Ensure that these materials are clean and free from contaminants before recycling them.
  3. Find recycling facilities: Locate recycling facilities or collection points in your area where you can drop off the recyclable materials. Many communities have designated recycling centers or curbside collection programs. You can also contact local waste management authorities for guidance.
  4. Encourage recycling among consumers: Educate your customers about the recyclability of your packaging materials and provide clear instructions on how to recycle them. Consider incorporating recycling messages and symbols on your packaging to promote responsible disposal.

The Cost of Switching to Sustainable Packaging

One of the concerns businesses often have when considering a switch to sustainable packaging is the potential cost implications. While there may be some initial investment involved, it’s important to view it as a long-term investment in the environment and your brand’s reputation. Here are a few factors to consider:

  1. Material selection: The cost of recyclable packaging materials may vary depending on factors such as material type, quality and quantity. It is essential to compare prices and explore different suppliers to find the most cost-effective options without compromising on quality.
  2. Operational adjustments: Switching to recyclable packaging may require adjustments to your production processes or equipment. There might be a learning curve involved, but over time, these adjustments can lead to more efficient and streamlined operations.
  3. Waste management savings: By embracing recyclable packaging, you can potentially reduce waste disposal costs. Many recycling programs offer incentives or reduced fees for businesses that actively participate in recycling initiatives.
  4. Brand reputation and customer loyalty: Investing in sustainable packaging can enhance your brand’s reputation and attract eco-conscious consumers who value environmentally responsible practices. This, in turn, can lead to increased customer loyalty and support.

While there may be some upfront costs, the long-term benefits, both financially and environmentally, make the switch to sustainable packaging a worthwhile investment.

Why Switch to Sustainable Packaging

There are several compelling reasons why businesses should consider transitioning to sustainable packaging:

  1. Environmental impact: Traditional packaging materials, such as single-use plastics, contribute to pollution, landfills, and marine debris. By using recyclable packaging, you actively reduce waste and conserve natural resources, helping to mitigate the environmental impact of your business operations.
  2. Customer preference: Studies show that a growing number of consumers prioritize sustainable products and packaging. By aligning with their values and offering eco-friendly packaging options, you can attract and retain environmentally conscious customers.
  3. Regulatory compliance: Many regions and countries are implementing stricter regulations on packaging waste and encouraging sustainable practices. By proactively adopting recyclable packaging, you can stay ahead of regulatory changes and avoid potential fines or penalties.
  4. Competitive advantage: Embracing sustainable packaging can differentiate your brand from competitors, showcasing your commitment to environmental stewardship. It positions your business as forward-thinking and can give you a competitive edge in the market.
  5. Long-term cost savings: While there may be some initial costs associated with switching to recyclable packaging, long-term savings can be achieved through reduced waste management expenses, improved operational efficiencies, and enhanced customer loyalty.

By making the switch to sustainable packaging, you contribute to a greener future, align with consumer preferences, comply with regulations, gain a competitive advantage, and potentially save costs in the long run.

In conclusion, transitioning to recyclable packaging is a significant step towards building a sustainable future. By following the steps outlined, collaborating with suppliers, educating your team, and communicating with customers, you can successfully make the switch. Remember to research and explore recyclable packaging options such as SKYMONO, SKYPAPR, SKYMAX and SKYLENE. ensuring both environmental responsibility and the functionality needed for your products. The initial investment in sustainable packaging is an investment in the planet and your brand’s reputation, paving the way for a more eco-friendly and responsible business approach.

/by

Plastic Packaging Tax Sees Increase

, ,

New changes in the tax rate and penalties for non-compliance take effect on April 1st, 2023, as the “soft landing” period comes to an end.

The final meeting of the Industry Working Group for the Plastic Packaging Tax took place yesterday at the Treasury, where important changes to the tax were discussed and finalized. The tax rate has been increased from £200 to £210.82, in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate. These changes will come into effect on April 1st, 2023. This change comes as the “soft landing” period for the tax draws to a close in April, and non-compliant companies will now face fines.

The Plastic Packaging Tax, which was introduced as a measure to encourage the use of recycled materials in plastic packaging and reduce plastic waste, has now become more stringent. With the end of the “soft landing” period, businesses that fail to comply with the tax regulations will be subject to penalties.

Key changes to the tax regulations include:

  1. Tax rate increase: The tax rate has been increased to £210.82, in line with the CPI inflation rate, to ensure that the tax remains effective in encouraging the use of recycled materials and reducing plastic waste.
  2. End of the “soft landing” period: The one-year grace period for companies to adjust to the new tax rules is ending in April. Starting from April 1st, 2023, non-compliant companies will face fines for failing to meet the tax requirements.
  3. Late return submission penalties: Companies that submit their tax returns late will now be fined. Late payment rules have been modified to bring the Plastic Packaging Tax in line with other taxes.
  4. Interest charges for late payments: Companies that submit their tax payments late will be charged interest on the outstanding amount.
  5. Penalties for non-submission: Companies that fail to submit a return will not only be fined but will also have their tax obligations estimated by the authorities.

As the Plastic Packaging Tax becomes more stringent, it is crucial for businesses to be aware of these changes and ensure their compliance. Companies are urged to review their current practices, make necessary adjustments, and submit their returns and payments on time to avoid fines and penalties. The increased tax rate and the introduction of stricter enforcement measures signal the government’s commitment to reducing plastic waste and promoting a more sustainable future.

In light of these changes, Skymark remains committed to innovation and development in relation to recycled content across our product ranges. Our continuous efforts in sustainability and eco-friendly packaging solutions will help our customers adapt to the new tax regulations while contributing positively to the environment.

/by